Recently, on the central adjustment to the new energy vehicles subsidy program news spread like wildfire.

　It is reported that blocked cheat fill loopholes, trapping of allowance of car of new energy resources policy system and improve the work has been in tension to promote them. Circulated a draft for discussion show that pure electric passenger car subsidy standards introduced "100 ton kilometers consumption consumption index, requirements of not more than 13kWh tons of power consumption per hundred kilometers of provisions, the parties raised widespread concern.

　　Chinese Academy of Engineering Yang Yusheng believes that tons of one hundred kilometers of electricity consumption indicators are too biased in favor of large electric vehicles, policy guidance will encourage enterprises to develop large cars, luxury cars, and energy saving and emission reduction ideas.

　　Yin Chengliang, vice president of Automotive Engineering Research Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, said, "tons of one hundred kilometers consumption" can not truly reflect the actual use of the vehicle energy consumption, but also need to be rigorous discussion.

　　"From a legal point of view, the policy should be formulated in accordance with the statutory procedures for public comment, in order to guide the new energy automotive industry healthy and orderly development." Gu Dasong, deputy director of the research center of traffic law and development of Southeast University, expressed his views.

　　And on the other hand, the passenger car market information association secretary-general Cui Dongshu is the policy responded with understanding and support, he told the "Securities Journal" reporter said subsidies should be framed smaller scope of implementation, "tons of 100 kilometers consumption only up to a threshold effect, consumer still has active option.

　　New deal triggered widespread controversy

　　Data shows, "tons of 100 kilometers consumption value is 100 km power and weighs business, which led to the higher the weight of the car more dominant and A00 car are difficult to reach the standard. Insiders worry, "tons of one hundred kilometers consumption" index of the proposed or with the new energy automotive industry to develop energy-saving emission reduction contrary to the original intention.

　　Yang Yusheng, academician of Chinese Academy of engineering that if considered from the whole life cycle of the vehicle, high tonnage is certainly conducive to apply for subsidies, but taking into account the battery products is also in fossil energy conversion and, for carbon dioxide emissions is adverse. This will encourage the development of large cars, luxury cars, luxury cars, and the idea of energy saving and emission reduction.

　　The industry generally believe that from the perspective of technological progress, the micro car is less than the mainstream models. But from the point of view of energy saving and emission reduction, the micro car is an important part of the new energy field.

　　North China University of Technology automotive industry innovation research center director Ji Xuehong believes that with the development of the sharing of economic, sub lease models are mini car. "So the government policy is to consider different models. The proposed policy should consider both advanced nature and fairness ".

　　In this regard, Yin Chengliang, vice president of Automotive Engineering Research Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University also agreed. In his view, the perfect details of energy consumption indicators and rationality need rigorous discussion, "tons of 100 kilometers consumption can not be a true reflection of the actual vehicle use under the condition of energy consumption, for different models should be treated differently.

　　From a legal point of view, the implementation of the policy should give the public a stable expectation. "At this stage the new energy vehicle industry policy is facing the biggest problem is that the company's expectations are constantly changing, which is detrimental to the development of the industry". Gu Dasong, executive deputy director of the research center of traffic law and development of Southeast University, expressed his views.

　　At the same time, he said, before the policy should be in accordance with the statutory procedures, the public to solicit opinions and hold expert argumentation, risk assessment and legitimacy of the argument. Policy formulation should be fair and transparent, reasonable and efficient, so as to guide the new energy automotive industry healthy and orderly development.

　　Raising the threshold is intended to promote orderly competition

　　It can be seen that the subsidy the political controversy focus on lightweight, total energy consumption and increase and a government shutdown politics practice neglect on the. Aiming at the above problems, the "Securities Journal" reporter interviewed the national passenger car market information association secretary-general Cui Dongshu, from the voice of another industry perspective and research analysis of the new deal's intention.

　　When it comes to the new deal cut the market choice, Cui Dongshu believes that a hundred kilometers of electricity consumption has only played a threshold effect, the individual micro low-speed electric vehicles excluded from the list of subsidies. And after entering the threshold, of course, consumers will choose the best economy, cost-effective models. This will form an endogenous, positive competition mechanism, this period can also be better to achieve energy conservation and lightweight requirements.

　"Some experts and scholars believe that after the implementation of the policy will limit the ability of consumers to buy small car, can only buy a large electric vehicle concerns, I think is overblown". Cui Dongshu told reporters that the first 13 kilowatt hours of Limited is still in the discussion stage, followed by the new deal on the micro - speed electric vehicles play a role is only to tighten rather than blocking.

　　Stand in the enterprise's point of view, need to change ideas, in the original basis for the installation of product safety components, which is also for product design improvement, to achieve the unity of safety and economy. "Opinions are not only out, I believe that companies will quickly find a balance through the market means," Cui Dongshu told reporters.

　　No matter how the policy is formulated, there will be relative "beneficiary" and "aggrieved party" ". For a long time, the noise of the dispute over subsidies seems to have overwhelmed the establishment of its original intention. The car as for children, "I seem to forget Liminganshen for fresh food handed out in contempt," the truth.

　　With nearly on the back slope mechanism, can see the material subsidy policy will gradually decline, to withdraw from the stage of history. The parties should stand in the process of history and macro perspective on the significance and value of the "post subsidy era".

　　"Subsidies should be framed to lower the scope of the implementation, to prevent the boundaries. Future stable development will be the tone of the new energy vehicle development. We don't need too much incremental, encounter, the first tight loose is necessary. " Cui Dongshu said.

　　Cui Dongshu introduces, last time, mini electric car industry cohabitation, car enterprises with the smallest battery, the light body for long life, and subsidies to cover even Guaizhuang full costs, caused by bad money by good money for the chaos, is not conducive to the healthy development of new energy vehicles and the government is unwilling to see, after all the mainstream models is the future of China's new energy vehicles.

　　It is worth mentioning that the current discussion on the revision of the new energy vehicle subsidy policy is still ongoing, the final program has not been announced. But it is certain that all kinds of new energy vehicles are faced with more stringent and detailed technical requirements, the dividend policy will shift the dividend policy, and the new energy bus subsidies will face a substantial reduction.

                                                                                                                    Reproduced to：China Securities Network